CLAIM [Claim]Viper CC Checker|TG @ViperChatAdmin

[t142]

I made a deposit of 10K$ on the defendant's website. However, very soon after, the accuracy of his checker started to malfunction. I initiated a refund request to the defendant, but he has not replied to my message yet.

 

[t142]

After March 8th, the other party did not reply to any of my messages again.

 

[t142]

I need to pay off the remaining balance of mine, which is worth 9,500$

 

[t142]

The report has consistently avoided addressing the issue of refunds.

​

 

[t142]

I paid a total of $10,000 and received 790,000 points, with an average of $0.012658 per point.
I have 754,890 points remaining, which are worth $9,555!
I need a refund!

 

[t142]

@Viper CC Checker @Fixxx

 

[Fixxx]

@Viper CC Checker please, give feedback!

 

[Viper CC Checker]

hello we will address this question very shortly the owner of the project will examine it now
dont worry we have insane repo so no one ever will leave us not happy

 

[Viper CC Checker]

We as a Viper team are very sorry to hear that your expectations and reality about our service did not coincide. However I cannot accept your claim regarding your attempts to blame me.

First of all, before purchasing the balance you were able to get a free test balance so you could test the quality and make sure that you make a purchase consciously and voluntarily. If after the test you somehow decided that the result which you received isn’t satisfying you - it’s not objective reality with which you can blame Viper team with something, it’s your own experience as you are building it on comparing 2 different CC checkers on the same pack of cards. First of all, this type of comparison is not objective, rather harmful for CCs as pre-authorising / authorising same CC in different merchants all over the world is obviously leading to bank anti-fraud detection and card block as a consequence. Moving further, when you compare one checker to another you never know which one shows objectively. CC checker is a service where a very low percentage of customers really understand how it works and how to deal with it results. Checker which you compare VIPER with can be based on whatever merchants.
P.S applicant sent us a screenshot where the difference in accuracy was 1 CC only.

Then, applicant claims that the admin of Viper is ignoring him. First, applicant doesn’t want to build a dialogue, his only claims are “make me a refund”, “make me a refund”, he doesn’t want to solve the issue, rather asking for a refund days long. He says that he will share some method with me but 1) these are just words 2) who will share a method with your competitor? Applicant is trying to get his deposit back after purchasing a service and using it and act through forums where any arbitrage is a way to find objectivity with the help of forum administration, while he is not doing anything but blaming the service and asking for money.

Finally, Viper team is not lying to the customers, we said to the applicant that we have some kind of fluctuations in the merchants we use. All customers were warned about it, including the applicant. Since then we are making everyday updates which lead to the stability. Some of the customers say even now that we are doing better than other popular checkers, but we are sure that we are still not at the best level and doing the everyday maintenance. What is more, checks used by customers during instability period are always compensated and taken into consideration. Viper is a service which is more than 1.5 years on the market and we are known for our stability and loyalty to the clients. We are not about to close the service but only push forward and get bigger and better from day to day.

We really hope that forum administration will take all the arguments in account and introduce a fair decision for our case



BUT STILL IM HERE TO MAKE THIS OUT THE BEST WAY POSSIBLE FRO US BOTH ! PLS SEND ME HERE YOUR JABBER SO ME THE OWNER CAN TALK TO YOU IN PRIVACY ABOUT MATTERS TO RESOLVE THIS PROBLEM ! <3 AND HAVE A NICE DAY

 

[Fixxx]

What is more, checks used by customers during instability period are always compensated and taken into consideration.

Were there periods of instability after the defendant started using the service?

 

[t142]

Were there periods of instability after the defendant started using the service?

yes，And it has caused me certain losses. I don't want the other party to be responsible for this part. I just want to get the remaining points refunded.

 

[Viper CC Checker]

Were there periods of instability after the defendant started using the service?

it was, now instability is fixed and many customers and shops are using our checker on the daily basis (@t124 used only 70k points during instability), after all instability periods we compensate points which were used during them to all the customers, in this particular case we are ready to give the compensation to @t124 as well

anyways, decision is after @Fixxx

if someone says that service works not stable, it should be proven, should'nt it? proven with some objective CC measurement, not just a random checker from darknet

 

[Viper CC Checker]

Уважаемые арбитры и администрация форума! @Fixxx @CrdPro
В ситуации, связанной с данным арбитражом, появились новые обстоятельства.

А именно:

10.03.2025 Истец выложил у себя в канале сообщение о том, что он продает свой баланс у нас в сервисе: полностью или по частям. Ник истца в телеграме @Leadjun, его канал @SSteamyu . Скрин №1 показывает, что именно с этого юзернейма мне написал истец, чтобы произвести покупку, скрин №2 показывает, что данный канал принадлежит истцу, и пост в канале о продаже баланса, скрин №3 - перевод поста с китайского на английский

10.03.2025 истец также открывает арбитраж, параллельно пытаясь продать баланс на сервисе и требуя от нас манибек за его покупку.

17.03.2025 истец совершил сделку по продаже своего баланса своему конкуренту (другому сервису по проверке СС ). На скрине №4 виден фрагмент базы данных, где показано, что в 17:54:49 был успешно совершен перевод баланса от истца другому клиенту. Чтобы сразу опровергнуть предположения о том, что в телеге был сделан мультиакк и истец перевел баланс "сам себе", прикладываем скриншот №5. В публичный доступ публикуем доказательства с частично замазанной sensitive информацией, все скриншоты продублированы в ЛС форума админам и арбитрам в первоначальном виде.

Истец не счел нужным сообщить ни мне, ни кому-то из форума о том, что он решил вопрос и получил деньги за свой баланс в нашем чекере, оставив эту ситуацию без внимания. Мы считаем, что в связи с недавно открывшимися обстоятельствами, арбитраж не имеет смысла как процесс, так как истец получил денежные средства за баланс в нашем сервисе путем перепродажи.

Заранее спасибо администрации и арбитрам форума.


скриншот 1 (пользователь @Leadjun совершает покупку, о которой идет речь в арбитраже, этот контакт истец оставлял на форуме как контакт для связи в своих темах)


скриншот 2 (канал истца, где был выложен пост о продаже баланса)


скриншот 3 (перевод поста для удобства арбитра и сообщества)


скриншот 4 (перевод баланса истцом)


скриншот 5 (юзернейм который был получателем баланса по данной сделке)

 

[t142]

I bought it at a price of 10,000$, and then sold it back at 7,000$ at the end. From March 7th when I requested a refund to March 18th when I sold off the remaining balance, if you had ever proposed a solution to the problem once or if you were willing to give me a refund, I wouldn't have lost so much money during this period.

 

[t142]

Dear Administrator @Fixxx，The arbitration can now be stopped. I don't need the other party to refund the money any more.I have solved this problem by myself.
Our sincerest thanks again for your support

 

[CrdPro]

Thanks.
Closed.